1. Project Management vs Strategic Management

The above title is an interesting notion as it can imply that Project Managers need to be strategically aware or have a saying in the strategic directions of the Project (s) they are involved.

 

We best know that in most cases, The Executive Board that oversees the Project execution sets the strategic direction of the project or in some cases the Steering Committee, however, what if the Project is small and the funding does not allow the bells and whistles of a large corporate wide Project implementation.

 

Before we can answer the above question, we need to know what is Project Management (PM) and then what is Strategic Management (SM) and the people who are responsible for the performance of these two Sciences, then we can simply answer the above question.

According to the Project Management Institute (PMI), Project Management:

 

Is the application of knowledge, skills and techniques to execute projects effectively and efficiently. It is a strategic competency for organizations, enabling them to tie project results to business goals and therefore better compete in their markets. It began to emerge as a distinct profession in the mid-20th century. PMI’s A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge identifies its recurring elements of Project Management processes that fall into five categories:

 

1)      Initiating

2)      Planning

3)      Executing

4)      Monitoring and Controlling

5)      Closing”

 

Therefore, we can argue that a Project Manager is the person who fulfils these stages based on a number of factors, in particular:

 

1)      Integration.

2)      Scope.

3)      Time.

4)      Cost.

5)      Quality.

6)      Procurement.

7)      Human Resources.

8)      Communications.

9)      Risk Management.

10)  Stakeholder Management.

 

Additionally, a Project Manager runs any given project based on a given methodology such as Prince 2, Agile, Scrum etc., which in turn comes with its own set of values, constraints, and outcomes.

 

 

On the other hand according to Dess, Gregory G., 'Strategic Management: Creating Competitive Advantages'; 2005,

 

 

“Strategic Management consists of the analysis, decisions, and actions that an Organization embarks on in order to create and sustain a Competitive Advantages (CA). This definition captures two main elements of Strategic Management: 

 

1.  The Strategic Management of an Organization consisting of three ongoing processes: analysis, decisions, and actions. That is, Strategic Management is concerned with the analysis of strategic goals (vision, mission, and strategic objectives) along with the analysis of the internal and external environment of the organization. Next, Owners must make strategic decisions.

These decisions, broadly speaking, address two basic questions:

 

a)      What industries should we compete in?

b)      How should we compete in those industries?

 

These questions also often involve an organization’s domestic as well as its international operations. Last are the actions that must be taken. Decisions are of little use, of course, unless they are acted on. Corporations and Companies must take the necessary actions in order to implement their strategies. This requires the Stakeholders and the Owners to allocate the necessary funds and resources and to design the organization to bring the intended strategies to reality.

 

2.     The essence of Strategic Management is the study of why some firms outperform others. Thus, managers need to determine how a company is to compete so that it can obtain advantages that are sustainable over a lengthy period. This means focusing on two fundamental questions:

 

 

a)      How should we compete in order to create competitive advantages in the marketplace?

b)      How should we compete in order to sustain competitive advantages in the marketplace?

 

 

For example, managers need to determine if the firm should position itself as the low-cost producer, or develop products and services that are unique, which will enable the Company to charge premium prices or some combination of both.

 

Managers must also ask how to make such advantages sustainable, instead of temporary in the marketplace. That is: How can we create competitive advantages in the marketplace that are not only unique and valuable but also difficult for competitors to copy or substitute?”

 

We shall not go too deep in to these questions, which are not in the scope of this blog, however, it is quite clear from the above two definitions of PM and SM that, a Project Manager is involved in the running of the project (s) he/she is involved and to some extent in the strategic directions of the Project (s) with the full knowledge and blessings of the Project Board / the Executive Board. On the other hand, a Strategic Manager (s) is involved in a much larger capacity of the strategic direction of the entire Organisation, which could also involve the Projects being undertaken by the Project Managers.

 

In recent years, a new Management Science has evolved entitled The Strategic Project Management, which is a new and powerful methodology intended to manage complex large-scale projects such as Telecom base projects spanning several years by combining traditional Business Analysis with Project Management tools and techniques.

 

The aim of this interesting and important methodology is to equip all managers – of whatever discipline – to manage projects more effectively. This Strategic Management process contains five key elements:

 

1)      Managing strategic business projects

2)      Linking projects with business strategy

3)      Strategic project definition

4)      Project strategy and planning

5)      Strategic project control and learning

 

The methodology will enable the PMs and SMs to apply Project Management tools successfully not just at the level of business strategy but also to operational change programmes and even to more strategic programmes aimed at improving short-term performance.

 

We hope this simple discussion has been of benefit to the Project Managers and the Strategic Managers out there. At Ksathra Systems however we have always taken in to account the Strategic direction and well as the Project direction of our Clients at heart and have always delivered to scope, time and quality that is expected of any professional boutique organisation out there in the Industry. 

Write a comment

Comments: 6
  • #1

    Sarah (Thursday, 08 January 2015 22:32)

    Hi,

    It was a very interesting blog post. I would strongly agree with you that Project Managers are often involved in making strategic decisions. I am a small business owner and from my own experience I can state that I am usually managing small projects myself, as well as making strategic decisions for the company. Certainly there are some advantages when one person comprehends both activities at the same time, however, it can be extremely time-consuming. The main reason I am doing everything by myself is that I do not have enough funds to employ strategic managers.

    My first question would be, if you think that a company can grow effectively if only one person is responsible for both Strategic and Project Management?

    My second question is that if you think employing additional member of staff responsible just for Strategic Management would be a wise long-term investment or it would not have a big impact on small business development.

    Thank you in advance,

    Sarah.

  • #2

    Michael Cyrus (Tuesday, 21 April 2015 22:47)

    Hi Sarah,

    I hope you are fine and that we are very sorry for the delay as we were in the middle a few Projects and it takes time as a small Boutique Business to answer all the questions we get and run small company too. However, as to answer to your questions, yes it is possible for a small business, as and when growing, for the PMs to also act Strategic Managers for their projects or businesses, as this is the only way to control the direction and the funding of the Projects they are managing.

    Furthermore, as a small business, at the beginning of your journey in order to make it profitable, to control the direction and the funding of your own projects and when you are comfortable that you are growing larger, and effectively, getting more projects, then maybe employ a person(s) for the Strategic direction that you, as a small business holder, wish to take for your own business.

    It maybe also be possible, if you wish, to start a small department and put the foundations of a future success for the Strategic direction of your own business internally.

    Our best wishes,

    Ksathra Systems.

  • #3

    James Marble (Wednesday, 22 April 2015 12:57)

    Hi,

    Again an interesting article/blog.

    I as a small business owner have always acted as a PM/Manager for any small projects we have conducted locally in the South East of UK. The article is somewhat academic in nature, however, it covers most of the important points as to the Strategic direction that a PM should take in a small SME.

    Thanks.

    James.

  • #4

    Michael Cyrus - MD (Monday, 27 April 2015 16:22)

    Hi James,

    Your comments are much appreciated.

    Kind regards,
    Michael.

  • #5

    Prof Mark Lycett (Monday, 11 May 2015 13:03)

    Hi Michael,

    This is an interesting article and we at the Brunel University, where you studied for your MSc, have always been in to the practicalities of PMs v SMs with numerous research ideas and solutions,

    Thanks,

    Mark.

  • #6

    Diederik Vos (Sunday, 24 May 2015 10:40)

    Hi Michael,

    This is an interesting Blog that I read with interest. Keep up the good work.

    Best wishes,

    Diederik.